The perception of property differed since, for Locke, it had a markedly higher value. It is noticeable that Locke’s and Jefferson’s visions were broadly similar: both men valued life and liberty as an inalienable right of every individual. This category was not merely a subjective measure of reality but instead reflected a social guarantee of satisfaction with political life. Instead of the property right, Jefferson pointed to the more American value of the pursuit of happiness (Langholtz). Thomas Jefferson, the famous American diplomat, slightly modified John Locke’s views in the Declaration of Independence.
In other words, every person was endowed with the inalienable right to his own life and the possession of the personal property. Indeed, John Locke perceived natural liberties as the freedom of life and the freedom of property of the individual. It is interesting to note that the concept of inalienable rights was often found among the views of eminent academics.
Henceforth the individual had freedom and the guarantee of its exercise only within the limits of the laws provided for. Whereas in the pre-state system, man’s natural liberties were limited only to the personal space and dignity of the other individual, Locke believed that governments had changed this paradigm. At the same time, the formation of state forms of government led to a marked suppression of the natural freedoms of the individual. According to Locke, the historical development of statehood was preceded by a state of nature, defined as the totality of the freedoms of the individual guaranteed by the laws of nature (Kesici). John Locke, the famous seventeenth-century English philosopher of liberalism and empiricism, is a crucial figure in contemporary political philosophy. Such study seeks to elucidate the interpersonal connections between individuals and the verticals that form the folded structure of society. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to reflect on the critical views of the researcher critically.Įssential questions for the social sciences are to explain the nature of the mechanisms that determine the coherence of society as a stable unit. As it is known, the man’s teachings have profoundly influenced the development of political philosophy and epistemology throughout the world. The subject of this essay is the ideas and theories of John Locke, the British educator, and theorist. In the context of the social sciences, such reflective analysis helps to structure the system of views and social values of the researchers. Critical reflection on theoretical concepts allows to systematize the learner’s thoughts and summarize practical knowledge through more thoughtful, careful study.